Not sure why it would count as criticism. As to the commented out stuff, it looks like a couple of random excerpts with no context. I removed the self-reference, I don't think it's only Wikipedians that have noticed this, and even if it was it shouldn't really be worded like that ( Wikipedia:Avoid self-references). Why is this? If it belongs in the article it should be visible, if it doesn't why is it in the source? Thryduulf 10:10, (UTC) I've just reworded a sentence slightly in this section (I still don't like the repetition of some in "Some Wikipedians have noted that some" but can't think at this moment how to rephrase to avoid it.) and spotted that there is much more criticsim hidden in comment tags.
25 There's no way to prove this was really by him.22 History Section: Date/Grammar mismatch.15 Encarta 2008 DOES contain the Mind Maze game, contrary otthe article.
13 What happened to the criticism section?.12 Fair use rationale for Image:Encarta.png.
0 kommentar(er)
